ral's notebook …access to all of ral's online activities

Thought for the Day July 16, 2025

July 16

Thought for the Day
Wednesday, July 16, 2025


I was startled awake this morning with Mary Traver’s (of Peter, Paul & Mary) voice ringing in my ears. She was singing lines, “If we do these things in the greenwood/What will happen in the dry? The song, from 1986, has been a favorite, though I have not heard it for a long time. I listened to it this morning and it still pierces me to the quick. As I was listening for the fourth time, I had the feeling that this would be the topic of my Wednesday, “Thought for the Day.” I am struck by the relevance of this song to our time, 39 years after it came out. So, my “thought” for today, is that you simply listen to this song, and note what strikes you. Here is a Spotify link to the song: Peter, Paul and Mary – Greenwood (25th Anniversary Concert) and here is a link to the lyrics:
Lyrics for Greenwood Peter Paul and Mary – Search

Questions and comments always welcomed.

Russ

Saturday Memory for July 12, 2025

July 12

Saturday Memory

July 12, 2025


When I was in the training program to become a Jungian analyst (in Los Angeles, 1969-1974), the most interesting thing was that the crucial part of my training was not part of the training program at all. The most crucial part of my real training was in a seminar on Zarathustra that was hosted by Hilda Kirch.

Hilda had been in the seminars on Zarathustra that Jung gave between 1934 and 1939. Jung would read from the text of Zarathustra and comment on it, and then the participants would ask questions that Jung would answer, or they would be asked questions by Jung about the material.

Hilda had been deeply affected by the seminars, and she told me it was one of the most important experiences of he life.

The transcript of the seminars (by Mary Foote) was made available to the participants in multigraphed form altogether distributed in 10 volumes. In 1970, when Hilde started the seminar for analyst candidates and others, she let me copy the 10 volumes. It is still a prized possession. The seminars were published in two volumes in 1988 by Princeton University Press as part of the Bollingen Series.

Hilda would read from the text of the seminars, slowly, and comment on both the portions from Zarathustra and Jung’s commentary as well as on the participants’ questions and comments. What was so amazing about this experience of Hilda’s doing this was that almost all participants would report on synchronicities that were occasioned by the seminar. The whole experience was psychoactive in ways that were not characteristic of the training program itself.

There was something “palpable” in the air during these meetings. I think it was some combination of the psychoactive text of Zarathustra, the psychoactive effects of Jung’s deep commentary, and especially Hilde’s psyche, so “alive” with the material from her experience in the original seminars, and then again in doing it her way.

Thought for the Day – July 9, 2025

July 10

Thought for the Day

July 9, 2025


Orogine is a figure that appears in my visions during acupuncture, as well as in my dreams. Her purpose, she says, is to “mentor my completeness.” In my most recent experience, she introduced me to a male figure, appearing in a Roman-like tunic, whose name is Tonarius. She tells me he will help with some of the details of my completeness and that I should follow his instructions closely. He tells me of the importance of discovering and knowing the geometric nature of things that I do and experience. He asked me to imagine a triangle. At the left base angle would be my weekly blog post called “Thought for the Day.” And at the right base angle would be my weekly post called “Saturday Memory.” He told me I needed a “third” at the apex of the triangle. I was not to “make something up” but to wait for the third to come to me. I’m waiting, and I’ll let you know when whatever it is arrives.

 

Saturday Memory for July 5, 2025

July 5

Saturday Memory
July 5, 2025



I once worked with someone who was a well-known film editor. He asked me to come to his studio. He wanted me to understand how he worked to make strips of film into what was finally seen as a “film.” He said it was important to work initially with just the film strips without sound, and that the soundtrack would be added later to be in synch with the actual product. At every point of the way, he asked for my reaction. In turn, I asked him to elucidate what he was “after.” What he said depended on the story, but for the action movie he was editing, it was increasing the rapidity of rising and falling tension. “But none of that was in the strips themselves. So how is that possible?” “Ah,” he answered, “that is the art.” The edited film became a masterpiece; it won several Academy Awards. He was overwhelmed with anxiety at the prospect of giving his speech if he won, so we practiced his speech together. What seemed to calm him the most was when we both did his speech out loud together in sync. At the ceremony, his speech went off without a hitch and was quite impactful. From time to time, over the years since, I have done this, speaking out loud in synch with dreams. Awkward at first, but repeated speaking brings the dream text together in a way that is surprising and meaningful.

Russ

Wednesday “Thought for the Day” for July 2, 2025

July 2

WEDNESDAY THOUGHT FOR THE DAY 

July 2, 2025 


A clear feature of today’s political, cultural, and economic climate is the staggering degree of hubris. In the Greek period, hubris was not only a person’s unending greed, pride, and rejection of any boundaries and limits; it was also a crime against the gods. 

Human attempts to punish hubris are most often ineffective and inconsequential. So once the crime of hubris is committed and human efforts fail to punish, the gods direct Atis to begin the act of punishment. Atis is an affliction that begins a process of degeneration. The hubristic character begins to “lose his mind” and as a result increases his hubristic behavior. The degree of pain and suffering of those impacted by the offending hubris increases dramatically.  

 It is this double aspect of increasing hubris and increasing pain and suffering that results from it that finally triggers the presence of Nemesis. This is the extremity that begins her awful punishment. She alone decides what fate will befall on the  one who commits the crime of hubris. The punishment always leads to utter downfall. And when this downfall is complete, the “story” is immortalized for future generations to learn from. This form of story is called Tisis.  

I got this far today before my acupuncture appointment. During my treatment, I experienced a vision, which is what happens at every session. Here is what happened. 

Acupuncture. The scene begins with me sitting in the chair area in front of the stage. Orogine appears and tells me she wants to talk about the piece I am writing on hubris. She tells me I am on the right track. She says I need to emphasize even more not only the hubris of individuals or collectives, but the pain and suffering their hubris causes. Likewise, she says she wants me to write a lament about the situation. She went on to tell me that when Nemesis comes, it will be like nothing ever seen before. She said I need to watch out for signs of her presence in dreams and visions. She tells me I will know when Nemesis is about to strike. 

So, I’ve got some work to do. 

  

 

 

Saturday Memory for 6.28.25

June 28

Saturday Memory

June 28, 2025


In my yet unfinished novel (Dreams: The Final Heresy), one of the darker characters is the Faceless Monk. He is Cardinal Broga’s right-hand man, his fixer. When I am actively writing, I write from what I call imaginal space. The characters occupy this space, and I can see them and hear them. Since I do not plot or outline or write from conscious expectations or ideas, I am mostly in the position of a kind of scribe. The imaginal contents take the lead in what gets written down.

Near the end of 2018, I woke from a nap experiencing either a receding dream or a hypnopompic image. The image was the Faceless Monk and he announced that there would be major and disastrous cyberattacks in 2019. The image pierced me with an intensity difficult to describe. The fictional character was clearly referring to an outer reality and not to a time point or theme of the novel. I wondered how this would change my experience of the Faceless Monk when I return to writing the next scenes of the novel. So, here we have a fictional character, entering a dream (or vision) and announcing future events in the “real” (outer) world.

What is the psychological status of such a phenomenon?

In my experience, I do not question the “reality” of a dream, vision, imaginal space, or things I experience of the outer world. They are all real experiences. The issue for me is not the reality status of experiences of any kind, but more the nature of the eros relation to any experience (regardless of source) and what I do in response to such experiences.

I am aware of the dire warnings of cybersecurity specialists about the inevitability of major cybersecurity attacks. As well, I experienced the dire warning of the Faceless Monk. The latter warning pierces me more deeply, and in response, I not only want to write this brief note but also to prepare for the likelihood of coming cyber disasters. I have my own fantasies as to what these might be, as I’m sure you will have as well.

The ontological nature of the Faceless Monk and his knowledge of future events in the world fall readily into the nature of prophetic intelligence. How this comes to be is unclear. Like Pirandello’s characters in search of an author, fictional characters, like dream characters, can function as autonomous beings outside of and independent of ego consciousness. They can “know.”

More about this another time.

Thought for the Day for June 26, 202

June 26

Enantiodromia, Imagination and Dreams

March25

 

 

 


In Part Two of Wandlungen und Symbole der Libido (1912),[1] Jung observed that “Every psychological extreme secretly contains its own opposite or stands in some sort of intimate and essential relation to it.” Later in this same paragraph (¶581), he defines enantiodromia[2] as “a conversion of something into its opposite.” He cites the Chinese Yin/Yang as an example. While the general idea of “opposites” is understood, the phenomenology of enantiodromic change is complex. The first level of complexity is that enantiodromia is a process, not just a change from one state to another. For example, when a puer psychology reaches extremity, there is no sudden change to a senex psychology. First of all, there is a period of breakdown of the puer structure, which leads to its collapse. This is followed by a period of chaos, which in turn is followed by a period of the tentative and gradual emergence of senex “seeds,” which in turn grow into senex structures. This sequence of extremity—breakdown, collapse, chaos, emergence, structure is characteristic of all enantiodromic change. The second level of complexity is that changes resulting from extremity are not always best conceptualized as “opposites.” The quality of difference, for example, is not always an “opposite.” The quality of “something else” is not necessarily the opposite. The quality of “otherness” may be something other than an opposite. All of these qualities may be thought of as “changing course” when extremity begins the breakdown cycle. For this reason, I use a more comprehensive, though invented word (allagiporeia), meaning “to change course.”

Jung also observed that the libido “wills its descent, its involution” and, in a broader sense, its demise (¶681). To illustrate this, Jung referred to Rubens’ Last Judgment, and pointed to the foregrounded image of a man being castrated by the serpent. He says of this image, “This motif illustrates the meaning of the end of the world.” Here, Jung is thinking far beyond the psychology of the individual and speaking of mythology’s crystallization of the phenomenon of extremity. This highlights the third level of complexity regarding enantiodromia: “The grand plan on which the unconscious life of the psyche is constructed is so inaccessible to our understanding that we can never know what evil may not be necessary to produce good by enantiodromia, and what good may very possibly lead to evil.”[3] Thus, what develops following any change of course, any enantiodromia resulting from the breakdown caused by extremity, cannot be known in advance to be for good or ill, no matter how one might regard it. For example, excessive greed invariably leads to breakdown. The financial crisis of 2008 led to the near collapse of the global financial system. What has emerged is not something “better,” but something that is worse by far, though “masked” by the recovery of markets that most everyone feels is wonderful.[4]

The prospect of enantiodromia at any given time, the urge for a change of course, will always appear in dreams, visions, synchronicities, art, and other manifestations of the unconscious. This is true both for individuals as well as groups and nations. The contents of these “irrational” messengers will always be different from what is found laid out in conscious intentions, plans, and programs. If change does not come about through conscious intention, then as conditions become ever more extreme, change will come about through intentions born and growing in the unconscious of individuals and the collective, changes that no one is prepared for, and no one knows how to control.

The Google entry for “enantiodromia” refers to the German film, The Lives of Others, as a good example of the meaning of enantiodromia. This is one of my favorite films, and I’d suggest you watch it. The film portrays an absolute state police power (the East German Stasi) intent on suppressing art. Even though we “know” the East German state fell 16 years before the film, the film dissolves this knowing and we are “there.” Such is the art of the film itself.

What does one “do,” then, in the face of an oppressive state (terror), or a looming catastrophe (climate change), or replacement by computer (machine intelligence)? We each must answer in our way. My answer lies first in trying to discern the wisdom of dreams. Second, I take the dream not as something to be interpreted, explained, or understood, but as an occasion for involving the deep imagination. When one is “exposed” to the deep imagination (and not just ego fantasies), one begins to engender the creative potential of the objective psyche. This is likewise the ground from which true art is generated and, as I have noted before, it is art that Jung says will serve as the welcoming eros for the Coming Guest.

 


[1] Literally, “Transformations and Symbols of the Libido,” but published in English as Symbols of Transformation (CW Vol. 5)

[2] The Greek word was coined by Stobaeus in the 5th century CE. There are numerous observations by Heraclitus of the same idea.

[3] C. G. Jung. “The Phenomenology of the Spirit in Fairytales.” (CW Vol. 9, ¶397)

[4] The world’s central banks have created money out of thin air (called “quantitative easing,” a kind of alchemy) that has inflated the world’s markets from equities to housing. These bubbles are built on a mountain of debt never before seen. Such bubbles are always “attractive” in the short-run, but cannot be sustained and the subsequent enantiodromia comes as a shock to those who thought they were in control and a disastrous loss of wealth to most everyone.

 

Saturday’s Memory for June 21, 2025

June 21

Saturday’s Memory for June 21, 2025


I think it was in eighth grade when the teacher assigned us to write a short story. I had a dream then, that was about what happened to the world when dreams stopped. So I wrote a story from this dream prompt. The teacher gave me an “F,” the one and only F I had ever received. When I asked her why, she said I had copied it from somewhere. I was stunned by this accusation. The next time I wrote any fiction was in college. I took a short story class. There were twelve students in the class. When our first attempt was returned, there were 11 Fs and 1 D. I had received the D. Improvement! At least I was not accused of plagiarism. I did try to write my first short story again many times but always failed to complete it. Almost 40 years later, I decided to take another class in writing fiction. The instructor was the well-known author, writing coach, and editor Gloria Kempton. She has been a prolific contributor to Writer’s Digest.

Imagine an apple,“ she directed. She then led a discussion on what we had experienced. Everyone complied, and she pointed out that our experiences were not gripping. They all amounted to putting a coin in a machine, and out popped an apple image, a compound of memories of apples and such. No drama, no tension, no plot, no story. She then proposed a writing prompt in which a minimally described character was on the verge of a crucial decision. She wanted us to be prompt in our response as well. Then, as we went around the room, the room was filled with story possibilities. No one seemed to suffer any writer’s block, perhaps because we were not writing, just “imagining.” She pointed out that all the proffered story lines were realistic, as if we all were aiming to mimic Flaubert. Then, she said, “Now, the hard part. Close your eyes; let all contents drop away. No prompt, no need to be prompt. See what comes. Don’t try to do anything.” I don’t recall how long this went on, but after a time of such spacing out, “something” happened that was different. No one could name it, but there were references to “electricity in the air” and “sparks flying.” The teacher said that we had contacted, to one degree or another, the story engine. She said she wanted us to write our short stories from “there.” No one could say exactly where “there” was, but we had had a taste. This experience broke the logjam I had suffered for so long, and I began writing my first novel, Dreams: The Final Heresy. I am writing the final chapter now, and I will publish it this year.

 

Wednesday Thought for the Day for June 18, 2025

June 18

Wednesday Thought for the Day 

June 18, 2025 


Humanity is failing in many ways, not the least of which is the failure to be an effective steward of resources, whether those resources are economic, social, cultural, scientific, artistic, or anything else. At bottom, this is nothing less than suicidal. For the first time, Homo sapiens are facing extinction, and much of the impetus for this ineluctable reality is the result of our own unbounded hubris.

One resource so far exempt from this ubiquitous mayhem is what happens when our ego consciousness and our body become paralyzed. I am referring to dreams. The likely reason for this exemption is that for the vast majority of individuals, collectives, and organizations, this resource is ignored.

Dreams are a resource other than conscious intentions, and for this reason are likely to be the source of “outside the box” ways of being, doing, and functioning. Where dreams are an object of attention, most of this attention is interpreting, explaining, or trying to understand dreams only in relation to consciousness. This is not the most fruitful way of working with dreams. The “otherness” of dreams requires recapturing the early sense of dreams as “alien.” So, to relate to dreams would be relating to an other. In this mutuality, this eros potentiality, the ego may find ways of “serving” the hints and possibilities presented by the other.

Recall the scene in The Day When the Earth Stood Still. Klatu, the alien, holds up a device, but the military decides it’s a weapon, destroys it, and injures Klatu. It was a gift from the alien for the president to be able to understand life in the universe. This scene provides a riveting example of wrongheadedness in the face of the other. It also mirrors how most humans treat the gift of dreams.

Saturday Memory for June 14, 2025

June 14

Saturday Memory
June 14, 2025


The first “girl Friday” was a young male selected by Robinson Crusoe to be a helpful servant on that day. “Girl Friday” came from the movie title. My first real job was as a “boy Friday,” as the owner called it, to be an all-around helpful hand in his local stationery store. I would stock stuff, sweep the floors, and run errands.
It was the summer of 1953, I was 14 going on 15, and my pay was $0.75/hour. The best thing, though, was what I fell in love with in the back room: a print shop, complete with an old-style Chandler & Price press, a Chandler & Price paper cutter, and several type cases and type stands. The owner set type by hand for business cards, stationery, envelopes, and a variety of other printed items. He noticed my interest and over the summer taught me to set type and to use the press and the cutter and even let me do real jobs as he began to trust me to do a good job. I was hooked.

I started high school in the fall of 1953 and immediately volunteered for the school newspaper, which, as I had discovered, also included a press room. I became the business manager after a while, and my girlfriend became editor in our senior year. I spent a good bit of time in the print shop. I gave one of the graduation speeches (entitled “Franklin and Einstein”). I spoke of Ben Franklin’s love of printing and talked about the importance of doing what one loved. In spite of all his achievements, which were extraordinary by any standard, his gravestone refers to only one thing: Printer.
In the fall of 1956, I started college, and one of the first things I did was to secure a volunteer position in the university’s Typography Laboratory, as it was called. It was indeed the most advanced such place I had ever seen, but it was still, basically, a print shop. But as my studies began to consume my time through the college years and then graduate school, my involvement in printing fell away.

 

« Older EntriesNewer Entries »